Colonoscopy: Another Medical Scam that Does NOT Prevent Cancer BUT Can Cause Death!

The “do-gooders” caught being deceitful again – more harm . . .

The procedure known as colonoscopies as a prophylactic for colon cancer is a multimillion dollar industry. Every year, over 14 million perfectly healthy individuals age 50 and up, submit themselves to this invasive procedure hoping to detect  colorectal cancer. But is it really effective?

It’s a Painful and Dangerous Procedure

It’s actually far more dangerous—and potentially deadly—than they’d like to admit. According The Annals Of Internal Medicine’s report on colonoscopies, an estimated 70,000 (0.5%) will be injured or killed by a complication related to this procedure. This figure is 22% higher than the annual deaths from colorectal cancer itself – the very disease the device was designed to prevent.

According to the Telemark Polyp Study I, colonoscopies actually increase mortality by 57% . For every person saved by a colonoscopy, 56 people suffer serious injury. A person can live for decades with colon cancer, but if the doctor punctures a hole in your intestine, you can die in a hurry.

It is very possible, and clinically proven, that you can be infected by HPV (Human Papilloma Virus); HIV; Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Helicobacter pylori,; Hepatitis B and C; Salmonella; Pseudomonas and Aeruginosa; Flu Viruses and other common bacteria such as, E. Coli O157:H7 and Creutzfeldt- Jakob Disease.

Colonoscopy Does NOT Prevent Cancer

According to the American Cancer Society, up until 2009 “…there are no prospective randomized controlled trials of screening colonoscopy for the reduction in incidence of or mortality from colorectal cancer.”

From an article in the New York Times, dated 2006; “The patients in all the studies had at least one adenoma detected on colonoscopy but did not have cancer. They developed cancer in the next few years, however, at the same rate as would be expected in the general population without screening.”

Another research study published in 2006 concluded that the screened patients in all of the studies developed colorectal cancer “at the same rate as would be expected in the general population without screening” in the next few years, even though all found polyps had been removed.

Colonoscopy is a Scam

It is a scam to make pharmaceutical industry and doctors rich. The AMA has conspired to make . . .

Read the FULL STORY . . .


PROOF that ADHD is a made-up condition for the benefit of Big Pharma.

ADHD diagnoses are on the rise, there is no denying it.

Doctors speak of the Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder ‘epidemic’ that is happening across the country.

But just because doctors are diagnosing more and more cases, it doesn’t necessarily mean that these children have anything wrong with them at all.

The condition really is a product of our time. 30, even 20 years ago there were hardly any cases of this behavioral condition at all.

So where did it come from? One writer thinks that Big Pharma could have the answer.

Joe Jarvis of the Daily Bell writes in this piece how ADHD is an invention by Big Pharma, created in order to sell medication. Could he be right?

Reading stats about ADHD you could be fooled into thinking this condition affects children of all backgrounds. But this is not strictly true.

As Jarvis points out, there are pockets in the country where the condition is much higher than others. So what’s the connection?

He states that some of the highest incidences of ADHD occur in the states of Arkansas and Kentucky. Jarvis makes the distinction that these two states are where children also spend most time outdoors.


He writes:

“These were the closest indicators I could think of that Kentucky and Arkansas children are more interested in being outside and active than cooped up in a classroom,”

So he highlights the fact that children who are ‘badly behaved’ i.e suffering with ADHD would simply prefer to be outside. Are children being labelled with ADHD simply because have too much energy and would prefer to be outside?

Traditional values . . .

Read the FULL STORY . . .

Court ruling confirms Gardasil vaccine kills people… scientific evidence beyond any doubt… so where is the outcry?

Image: Court ruling confirms Gardasil vaccine kills people… scientific evidence beyond any doubt… so where is the outcry?

(Natural News) May God bless the Tarsell family, who fought the U.S. government eight long years to validate a medical burden of proof that the Gardasil vaccine killed their daughter. The Tarsell’s 21-year-old daughter Christina Richelle “died from an arrhythmia induced by an autoimmune response” to Gardasil, an HPV vaccine that she received only days before her death.

The final ruling has been confirmed by the Department of Health and Human Services: Merck’s Gardasil vaccine causes autoimmune problems that cause sudden debilitation and/or death. If the young girl had been gunned down by a madman with an AR-15, then there’d be national headlines and a march on Washington. Since this young woman was “shot” to death by a vaccine, the whole story gets swept under the rug.

Never mind that the Gardasil vaccine is responsible for ending the lives of 271 young women to date, according to over 57,520 adverse event reports obtained from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System. If 271 young people died in a school shooting, the news coverage would be nonstop in support of gun bans. How about a ban on Gardasil – a real modern day assault weapon?

The Tarsell’s case was initially taken up by the Vaccine Court, which is a payout system that was set up to compensate families for vaccine damage. Vaccine makers pay an excise tax to this system for every vaccine they sell. This money (cost of doing business) is used to pay out damages to select families who can medically prove they were damaged by a vaccine. This system protects vaccine makers from being sued in a true court of law, ensuring that vaccines will continue to be manufactured for the “good of all.”

Read the FULL STORY . . .

7 Foods We Eat In The U.S. That Are Banned In Other Countries

The US really doesn’t care if the people get poisoned!!

Think you can trust the FDA with your health? Think again! Check out the toxic foods that are allowed in the U.S. but not in other parts of the world.

April 17, 2017

Competition in the production of food is huge in the United States. Farmers and manufacturers need to do things fast and cheap in order to make a profit. Unfortunately, fast and cheap doesn’t necessarily equate to healthy for humans, because harmful chemicals are often used to increase profit margins.


We consumers don’t know half of the toxic substances being put in our food and have to rely on the government to protect us. Sadly, the U.S. is doing a poor job of it.

Why is this? Basically, because Europe (and many other countries in the world) have higher standards than we do. They follow something called the “precautionary principle,” which means when substantial evidence of danger to human health is shown, then protective measures are taken—even if there’s uncertainty. The U.S. only takes protective measures when there’s a heap of evidence.


Feeling nervous? There’s no reason to be too concerned. Although some of these products and chemicals are banned in other countries, most of them technically pose extremely small risks, if any at all.

The safest route is to rely on scientific, factual research published in reputable journals—and stay up to date on any new developments that may affect your diet. More research may reveal these products as actual dangers to the American consumer, but it just might clear them for worldwide usage, too. Here are a few additives to keep an eye on.

Artificial Food Dyes

What it is: Food coloring made from petroleum or crude oil

What it does: Makes your food look pretty! Studies show that people prefer the taste of their food to match the color. Enter food dye. The artificial type is cheaper than the natural variety and lasts much longer.


Why it’s bad for you: Although food dye is typically associated with cancer and tumor growth in adults, a clear link hasn’t been established. However, a report published in Environmental Health Perspectives pointed out a few concerning missteps in the risk assessments of food dyes. The research conducted on rats did not consider any in-utero exposure and only lasted two years, which is concerning when most cancers emerge in the third year of the rodent’s life.

That being said, the biggest controversies surround kids. Studies show that artificial dyes are lightly to hyperactivity in children, allergic reactions, lack of concentration, and poor judgment.

Where you find it: Sodas, juices, candy bars, processed snacks, cereals, candy—basically anything that looks bright and colored


What you can do about it: Check out the natural dyes that are popping up in foods in stores like Trader Joe’s and Whole Foods. They use natural ingredients like beets and turmeric to color your food. They cost a little more but are worth the price! You can also find recipes online to create your own all-natural dyes from ingredients in your kitchen.


What it is: A type of sucrose polyester blend made from ingredients found in foods like vegetable oil and sugar

What it does: Makes your food less fattening, but still great tasting. It has the properties of fat but contributes no fat, no calories, no trans fat, and no cholesterol.


Why it’s bad for you: Although long thought of as a cause of major gastrointestinal side effects, including intense diarrhea, few studies found any significant impact on the gastrointestinal system. However, studies show that rats that consumed Olestra in combination with real fats not only didn’t lose weight, they actually gained it. Studies show that it also may interfere with vitamin absorption.

Where you find it: Snack items like chips and nachos


What’s being done about it: The only thing that you can do is avoid products made with this. The U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) continues to allow it on the market despite objections from organizations like the Center For Science in the Public Interest.


What it is: A drug known as a phenethanolamine.

What it does: Causes increased muscle protein growth in animals while decreasing fat. The animals given ractopamine can gain lean body mass while eating less. The result is a better quality product that costs less.

Read the FULL STORY . . .

Evil Google pushing “final solution” to eradicate independent news from the web… FOREVER

Image: Evil Google pushing “final solution” to eradicate independent news from the web… FOREVER

(Natural News) In order to salvage the failing mainstream media and stop the public from getting news elsewhere, advertising and search engine behemoth Google plans to invest $300 million into a new algorithm that, for all intents and purposes, threatens to permanently destroy the independent news industry.

Known as the “Google News Initiative,” the program will redirect advertising dollars back to mainstream publishers and away from many up-and-coming news outlets that have broken free from the Wall Street propaganda machine. Google says it will begin to work with publishers to “elevate accuracy, quality content and stem the flow of misinformation and disinformation” – which is just code speak for censorship.

If Google gets its way – and what’s to stop the company at this point? – then you can say goodbye to websites like Natural News that probably won’t make the “cut” in terms of meeting Google’s “truth” standards. Google will quickly become the sole decider in what constitutes “quality journalism,” which it will prop to the top of the search engine list, while everything else will be de-prioritized.

In a statement, Google explained that it plans to work with the “news industry” to combat “fake news” and “build a stronger future for journalism.” And the company is teaming up with legacy names like The Washington Post, The New York Times, Financial Times, and media mogul Gannett Company, Inc. to make that happen.

“The initiative will include a new lab to analyze and parse out what is deemed ‘mis- and disinformation during elections and breaking news moments;’ a fact-checking partnership with Stanford University and corporate media non-profit groups like the Local Media Association and the Poynter Institute; and a new service meant to expedite reader subscriptions to pay-gated news websites, among other new projects,” explains Mint Press News writer Elliott Gabriel about the upcoming changes.

Alleged “Russian meddling” in 2016 presidential election being used as excuse to censor the web

This sudden rush to censor the internet by Google stems in large part from the hysteria over alleged “Russian interference” in the 2016 presidential election. Hillary Clinton and her hordes of brainwashed supporters somehow convinced themselves that the Kremlin handed the election to Donald Trump, and ever since there’s been a massive push to control the flow of information online in order to prevent this type of scenario from ever again occurring.

Caving to pressure from leftists to “do something!” in response to these made-up allegations, Google has promised to alter its algorithm in order to stifle information that liberals don’t like, while propping up information that they do like. Google will, in essence, become the ministry of propaganda for the left, seeing as how Google maintains a formidable monopoly over digital content.

Meanwhile, independent news outlets like Natural News and many others will continue to see readership traffic directed elsewhere, making it that much more difficult to counter the official narrative of any given issue. The legacy press will once again attain full control over the flow of information, and any information that runs contrary to it will be sanctioned as “fake news” and blocked from turning up in search engine results.

Read the FULL STORY . . .

Physicists Say Twin Towers Destroyed by Controlled Demolition on 9/11

(ANTIMEDIA) Christmas has come early for “conspiracy theorists” around the world. An academic report published by Europhysics News in time for the anniversary of 9/11 is questioning the official explanation for the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001, and their conclusion may make even the most rational person rethink their outlook. As the report from Europhysics News, a “ magazine of the European physics community,” notes:

“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST [U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology] reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists. Instead, the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.”

Entitled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” the investigation was conducted by Steven Jones, a former professor of physics at Brigham Young University; Robert Korol, a professor emeritus of civil engineering at McMaster University in Ontario, Canada, and a fellow of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering and the Engineering Institute of Canada; Anthony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer; and Ted Walter, author of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’s Beyond Misinformation: “What Science Says About the Destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7.”

The Europhysics News report begins by questioning the official explanation for the collapse of the three buildings on September 11, 2001, as determined by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). NIST began carrying out an investigation in August 2002, and their findings are still questioned to this day. The report reminds us that:

“Indeed, neither before nor since 9/11 have fires caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise—nor has any other natural event, with the exception of the 1985 Mexico City earthquake, which toppled a 21-story office building. Otherwise, the only phenomenon capable of collapsing such buildings completely has been by way of a procedure known as controlled demolition, whereby explosives or other devices are used to bring down a structure intentionally.”

The report explains why this would be the case, offering four main explanations why steel-framed high rises have endured large fires in the past without undergoing total collapse: (1) the heat of a fire and its duration do not typically generate enough energy to heat the large structural members to the point where they would fail; (2) most high-rise buildings have fire suppression systems (such as water sprinklers) that would further inhibit the fire from reaching anywhere near the heat necessary to create a total collapse; (3) the structural members are protected by fireproofing materials, which are designed to prevent the structure from reaching failure temperatures within specified time periods; (4) steel-framed high-rise buildings are designed to be highly redundant, meaning that the buildings can suffer a partial collapse due to a fire but would not result in a disproportionate collapse of the entire structure.

Countless other steel-framed high-rises have experienced large, long-lasting fires without suffering either partial or total collapse,” the report points out.

Read the FULL STORY . . .

Male Escort Exposes 36 Gay Priests in File Sent to Vatican Containing Explicit WhatsApp Chats and Erotic Photos

A 1,200-page dossier containing the names of 34 “actively gay” priests and six seminarians in Italy has been sent to the Vatican by the archdiocese of Naples.

The allegations were compiled by Francesco Mangiacapra, a gay male escort who told local media he couldn’t put up with the priests’ “hypocrisy” any longer.

“The aim is not to hurt the people mentioned, but to help them understand that their double life, however seemingly convenient, is not useful to them or to all the people for whom they should be a guide and an example to follow,” Mangiacapra said, as reported by the Corriere della Sera.

GettyImages-624336818 Newly nominated cardinals, archbishop of Kuala Lumpur, Anthony Soter Fernandez, right, bishop of Novara in Italy, Renato Corti, center, and priest from . . .

Read the FULL STORY . . .